Friday, March 30, 2007

On the North Coast

Ferndale Repertory Company celebrates its 35 years in REPFEST35 with day-long events on Saturday, March 31, culminating in a Celebrity Dinner and Auction, hosted by Bo Foxworth, a Ferndale Rep alum (and son of current A.D. Marilyn McCormick) who is now a noted Los Angeles stage and screen actor (among his recent stage roles were Touchstone in As You Like It and the title role in Hamlet.)

Earlier in the day there's a Ferndale Rep Alumni Reunion and other events involving the community, and celebrating the storied history of this important North Coast theatre. Both the Reunion and the dinner are likely to be among the social highlights of the year.

There's more information at the Ferndale Rep site. Congratulations, Ferndale Rep--and many happy encores!

Thursday, March 29, 2007

Cyrano at Northcoast Prep

Within a few months in 1946, the great English actor Ralph Richardson played both Falstaff in Henry IV (a play just staged by North Coast Rep) and Cyrano in Cyrano de Bergerac (a play just staged by North Coast Prep.)

 Though I missed these Sir Ralph performances (as I was busy being born between them) Richardson’s biographer Garry O’Connor notes that his interpretation of Falstaff was unique, using “the sensuality…the roguery and trickery” as “metaphors for an inner vision” of “childish idealism” and a “heartfelt romanticism” akin to Don Quixote. Since in Rostand’s play, Cyrano approves of being compared to Quixote, Richardson probably embodied a link between these characters, who as it happened appeared simultaneously on North Coast stages last weekend.

 I’ve come to expect themes of idealism and virtue in the plays the North Coast Prep students select, but I knew Cyrano as mostly a romantic figure from the movies and a musical stage version (which I saw in its pre-Broadway Boston run, after a highly liquid lunch with its writer and lyricist, the novelist Anthony Burgess).

 The original Cyrano de Bergerac stage play presented in absorbing fashion by the younger members of the Young Actors Guild dramatized more substantive heroism than I recalled, such as Roxanne’s daring visit to the soldiers on the front.

 Genay Pilarowski (alternating with Rosemary O’Leary) as Roxanne and Caleb McIlraith (alternating with Julian Eubanks) as Cyrano, fully inhabited their roles. Gerald Beck’s multi-level set made cunning use of the Gist theatre, and Jean Bazemore’s usual discerning direction was aided by friends who stepped in when she was temporarily hospitalized during rehearsals: Michelle Francesconi, Michael Fields and Donald Forrest.

 And with Cyrano’s dying words, the idealism was flamboyantly apparent: “But who fights ever hoping for success? I fought for lost cause, and for fruitless quest!…I know you now, old enemies of mine! Falsehood!..and Compromise! Prejudice! Treachery!…Folly—you? I know that you will lay me low at last!…Yet I fall fighting, fighting still!”

Henry IV Part 1

Though the most enduring character in the Henry IV plays is Falstaff (wildly popular in Shakespeare’s time and later the subject of a novel, symphony, several operas and Orson Welles’ amazing film, The Chimes At Midnight) they are mainly about Prince Hal, and his journey to become the heroic Henry V.

The play of that title is the last in the sequence and the most familiar, owing to the movie versions by Laurence Olivier and Kenneth Branagh. The first play in this sequence is actually Richard II, about the ineffectual king deposed by Bolingbroke, who becomes Henry IV. Henry seizes the crown with popular support, at least until he has the imprisoned Richard killed. His reign is then threatened by rebels in the north with their own claim to the throne, and those wars are the substance of the Henry IV plays, particularly Part One, now on stage at North Coast Repertory Theatre.

 All of this actual English history was familiar and important to Shakespeare’s first audiences, so the very slow beginning of this text was more innately interesting to them than to us. The NCRT production directed by Gretha Omey moves swiftly through this thicket, partly by cutting and moving around text, partly with stripped down staging, a fast pace and a chorus substituting for several characters.

 The outlines of the action emerge pretty clearly, along with at least one of the main concerns of the play: the legitimacy of the king, and of his heir. Prince Hal spends his time not at court but in a tavern, in the company of the fallen nobleman, Falstaff. But when the war begins and Hal’s father doubts his loyalty as well as his fitness, Hal passes his first test with heroism on the battlefield.

 But what this production gains in speed and force it loses in complexity, characterization, subtlety (important to humor) and ultimately in meaning. Though the actors all have their strong moments (particularly James Read as Falstaff and Lonnie Blankenchip as Henry IV), the presentation tends towards shouted caricature. King Henry and Hotspur (a leader of the rebels) are Angry. Falstaff is Drunk. Prince Hal is Drunk, and then becomes Angry.

 This seems a stylistic choice--- one that some attendees may favor, particularly those who believe that the bipolarity of broad comedy and one-note melodrama defines theatre. They are likely to also enjoy the stage fights, which are presented with built-in sequences of slow mo. (Let audience members be forewarned to keep their seats throughout the play, however, or risk being run over by actors frequently dashing full speed through the aisles onto the stage.)

 While there is effective stagecraft supporting this approach, for me the most successful scenes were the few intimate stagings: between Hotspur (Victor Howard) and his wife, Lady Percie (Gretha Omey) and especially the reconciliation scene between Henry and Hal (Greag Brown.)

The reconciliation scene also benefits from a textual transposition, with excised lines moved to the very beginning of the play. But the production ends with a more questionable lifting of lines, from another play (the second part of Henry), transformed into a sentimental elegy for Hotspur, which tends to suggest the play is about him, which it isn’t.

 Everyone involved can be justly proud of the months of effort that went into this production, and Omey’s willingness to take risks is also admirable. But for me, too many key scenes didn’t work, in a production that bypasses many of the character questions as well as political and moral questions which constitute the difference between Shakespeare’s play and the equivalent of a medieval war movie with better language. As (almost) usual, I urge you to see and judge for yourself.

Curiously, this is the only review of North Coast Rep's Henry IV Part 1 published so far. Neither the Times Standard nor the Eureka Reporter chose to review it in their weekend arts sections, though Laura Provolt gave a rave review of Northcoast Prep's Cyrano in the Reporter.

There's more I could say about Henry IV and the North Coast Rep production, but one thing I could add to my review is the observation made by one of the actors in the Julie Taymor film version of Titus Andronicus (in a DVD extra): that Shakespeare is the toughest acting job around. It's generally true of directing, too.

But its an essential challenge to take on. Just yesterday as I scanned the newsstands at Northtown Books, I saw three periodicals with articles on Shakespeare featured on their covers. There are always new books as well as new productions.

Shakespeare is vitally important to theatre, but also eternally relevant to theatregoers. The questions of the legitimacy and authority of the monarch that are central to the cycle of history plays that includes the Henry IVs was a live question to Shakespeare's first audiences, facing the aging Queen Elizabeth who had no children or obvious heirs to the throne.

 Today, one can muse on the story of Prince Hal in view of our current monarch, George II: also a bad boy in his youth. It seems that with Afghanistan and Iraq, he may have seen his chance to become the heroic Henry V hero. Maybe he actually sees himself that way. It would seem so. And that's his tragedy, as well as ours.

Saturday, March 24, 2007

The Endless Stage

I saw two shows on local stages this weekend, Shakespeare's Henry IV Part I at North Coast Rep, and Rostand's Cyrano de Bergerac performed by the Young Actors Guild of North Coast Preparatory, at Gist Hall Theatre. As it happens, roles in these two plays were notable triumphs for the great English actor, Sir Ralph Richardson (seen here in a 1981 photo by Lord Snowden.)

Richardson played Falstaff in Henry IV Part 1 twice. The first time he was a new member of the Old Vic in 1930, and shared the stage with Laurence Olivier as Hotspur. The next time was in 1945 and 1946, in both parts of Henry IV, with Olivier as Hotspur in Part 1 again. Richardson's interpretation was new: he played Falstaff not as a belching vulgarian, but as a dignified lover of anarchy, a portly Quixote. He won great acclaim in both London and New York when the Old Vic was in repertory there in 1946, and returned the role, fallen into disrepute in modern times, to the ranks of the great parts.

He played Cyrano later that year. When the roles came up for the Old Vic season that fall, he had first choice as senior member. He chose Cyrano, although Olivier coveted the role. Olivier knew that Richardson wanted to play Lear, so he chose that role, assuming that Richardson would want to trade. He didn't. Olivier's only stage Lear was controversial--some thought him too young, but others (including Noel Coward) thought it was a brilliant re-conception and performance. But Richardson's Cyrano was a unanimous triumph. As Cyrano is also a kind of Quixote (which he admits during the play), it seems Richardson found common threads of bedraggled honor and stubborn romance in both parts.

As it happened, Richardson was knighted during the run of Cyrano, so he became Sir Ralph Richardson then. This added its own panache to the role that personifies that quality.
Posted by Picasa
Audience Beware

Let this be a warning that should be posted in the North Coast Rep lobby during the run of Henry IV, Part 1: Audience members are warned to keep their seats during the show, and those sitting in aisle seats are cautioned not to lean too far into the aisles. For at numerous and unpredictable times, actors will be running at full speed in the aisles, from behind the audience towards the stage, some of them armed with spears. Failure to heed these warnings could result in serious injury.

Theatre is supposed to be dangerous, but short of being physically dangerous to the audience. There was an epidemic of open flames on local stages a few years back, at least once in close company with highly inflammable material that I uncomfortably witnessed. Audience complaints, producer sanity or more active fire safety people--or some combination of these--put that practice out.

Some people complained of noxious fumes, particularly cigarette smoke, coming from the stage, so non-tobacco smoke with posted warnings is now the norm. The latest fashion that probably needs to be addressed is the increasing use of the audience's part of the theatre by actors during the performance. The stage is no longer enough. Actors declaim from the seats and the aisles, and particularly, make their entrances onto the stage from the "house."

There are certain dramatic advantages, or there were before this became commonplace: the element of surprise, the novelty of wrapping the show around the audience rather than limiting the perspective to audience facing the stage.

However, there is a problem: the audience. The "house" is their space. If the audience stays off the stage, they have a reasonable expectation that the actors will not invade their space, preventing them from movement within it. This is more than etiquette: it is a matter of health and safety, particularly when--as in the current North Coast Rep production--the house aisles are regularly used by actors running onto the stage. Sometimes they do so shouting, which merely threatens temporary deafness to the unwary. But they are moving at such heedless speed that the next patron who feels the call of nature at the wrong moment, may wind up a casualty of the long-ago English wars being depicted.

I hope it does not take such an injury, and the resulting lawsuit, to suggest that this practice be abandoned.

Thursday, March 22, 2007

The Cherry Orchard, Down the Rabbit Hole at OSF

North Coast stages were relatively quiet in recent weeks (which is about to change---see below) so it was a good time to catch the early offerings at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival in Ashland.

 Four of the eventual 11 plays this season are playing now. Two will continue through the summer (Shakespeare’s As You Like It and Tom Stoppard’s On the Razzle—likely to be one of this year’s hits), so in this column I’ll concentrate on the two that end earlier: Chekhov’s The Cherry Orchard (on stage until July 8) and Rabbit Hole, a new play by David Lindsay-Abaire, which closes on June 22.

 Anton Chekhov intended The Cherry Orchard to be a comedy, so the story goes, and was furious when Konstantin Stanislavsky directed its first production as a mournful tragedy. In her final play as OSF’s Artistic Director, Libby Appel strikes a lovely balance, illuminating both aspects.

The comedy comes in part from her own fresh adaptation, including choices of language (so this early 20th century stage classic ends with the accusation, “Nincompoops!”) She also injects some motion into staging the social whirl—not quite as frenetic as Renoir’s film classic, Rules of the Game, but to the same effect. The giddy movement behind designer Rachel Hauck’s gauzy screens in the party scene was particularly evocative.

 The tragedy is partly in the destruction of a home that embodied generations, and of the cherry orchard itself: Chekhov’s ecological prophecy of nature’s indifferent destruction. (Though oddly we never see even a representation of the orchard itself in this production.) But in this elegy to an aristocracy falling apart after Russia emancipated its serfs, there is also the tragedy of wasted lives, in the past and to come.

Like the Renoir film, this play exposes the destructive decadence of the upper class while honoring the characters’ humanity and individuality, including their pretensions, ambitions, weaknesses and superficialities: the human comedy.

 The play’s key character is Lopakhin, the businessman whose parents were serfs on this estate, and who eventually buys it, intending to cut down the cherry trees to build vacation homes for the new middle class. Often treated as the crass villain, he was played as the sympathetic voice of sanity in a production I saw at Carnegie Mellon University.

 Again, Appel strikes a Chekovian balance, with Armando Duran’s expansive portrayal of Lopakhin as a man of energetic contradictions. He embodies the Working Class Hero syndrome by professing shame for his crassness one moment, then reveling in it the next. He expresses admiration for the wealthy family, followed quickly by contempt. The scene in which he looks around in amazement at this great house he now owns, where his “father and grandfather were slaves, where they weren’t even allowed in the kitchen,” while another kind of shame paralyzes the former owners, is a riveting high point.

 Twelve individually drawn characters and their various relationships is a lot to absorb, so audiences take some of the drama with them, to sort out in recollection or in seeing the play again. The crispness and clarity characteristic of OSF productions (along with the courage to present the play’s full length) makes that possible, while providing a superior theatrical experience.

 Unlike Lindsay-Abaire’s fantasy/comedy Fuddy Meers (produced at OSF in 2001 and here at Redwood Curtain in 2002) Rabbit Hole is a naturalistic drama, about a contemporary middle-class family coping with the death of a young child. The conflicting ways that the husband and wife cope with their grief are further complicated by the wife’s pregnant sister, and her mother who is still dealing with the death of her own son.

 Despite this description, the play isn’t heavy. The playwright’s skillful storytelling and light touch seem designed to make the audience as comfortable as possible, but that may also result in characters that seem a little prepackaged, involved in situations out of a grief management manual (it’s not surprising that the play is being adapted for the screen).

But capable acting, evocative music and the usual superior production values keep it all afloat. The actors’ commitment is especially apparent—even in the fairly predictable role of the mother, Dee Maaske brings nuance and real emotion.

 One subtextual element I liked was the class difference between the mother’s generation and the couple’s, a change that adds to the confusion of living with this horrific break in the fast track middle class flow, for which our living-in-TV commercials society makes no allowances, and has no adequate rituals.

 But then, class awareness probably comes naturally to a playwright with a South Boston working class background and a Sarah Lawrence and Julliard education. I suspect many will find reasons to respond to this contemporary problem drama.

 Coming Up: North Coast Prep opens Edmond Rostand’s Cyrano de Bergerac, directed by Jeanne Heard Bazemore, on Wednesday, March 21 in the Gist Hall Theatre at HSU, with performances through Saturday. North Coast Repertory opens Shakespeare’s Henry IV Part I on Thursday, March 22 with a benefit for cast and crew.

McKinleyville High and the Shake the Bard company present the musical Oliver! at the D Street Neighborhood Center for two weeks beginning March 22. Clowns Without Borders perform on Saturday at 2 and 8 PM at the Dancenter in Arcata, to support expeditions by local performing artists to Mexico, Haiti, Guatemala and South Africa. And next Saturday, March 31, Ferndale Rep presents Repfest35, an all day series of events and entertainments to celebrate the Rep’s 35th anniversary.

Wednesday, March 21, 2007


My very part-time, hourly gig doing some basic gathering, organizing and disseminating of information for HSU Department of Theatre, Film & Dance productions, limits what I can write about HSU shows in the Stage Matters column I write for the North Coast Journal, which is also a very part-time gig, paying a flat per column rate, with no benefits or expenses.

I was hired for both gigs at roughly the same time, and both parties knew of the other possibilities before I was hired, and both knew and approved of my commitment to not review HSU shows in my column.

Out of some 32 columns, I wrote something substantial about HSU shows in four, with this basic disclosure. Conflict of interest is a complex issue, and there are many factors involved, particularly in terms of ordinary practice here in Humboldt. I’ve been writing and editing professionally for about 35 years, and my integrity has always been important to me. I’ve made some substantial sacrifices based on principle, and in general I believe my past supports my ethical commitment. I understand the difficulties and I certainly feel the awkwardness of this situation, but basically, my conscience is clear. As conflict of interest is also a matter of appearances, I leave those judgments of what the Journal publishes to its editors.

But I do face the dilemma of a different sort of conflict as theatre columnist: between the appearance of a conflict of interest, and my responsibilities in covering North Coast theatre. To put it simply, no column that purports to cover North Coast theatre can possibly ignore HSU theatre. In terms of quality, of its unique contribution in the plays and the theatre it does, and its place in the theatre and general community, it must be part of the mix, just as Dell’Arte is, or North Coast Rep or Ferndale Rep. I want to be fair to all, and that means being fair to HSU as well.

But in the past year or so, I discovered that if I did not write about HSU theatre, then nothing about these productions appeared in the Journal. That’s a disservice to Journal readers as well as to all the people involved in HSU theatre and dance. It’s especially missed since the Journal lives in Arcata, and so does HSU.

Recently I took this concern to my editors at the Journal, and received their assurances that they will make an effort to ensure that somebody covers HSU theatre in its pages. So I don't have to write about it in the Journal, and that particular conflict issue won't pertain.

My writing about North Coast theatre is still incomplete without writing about HSU. (Plus they do plays there, and plays are what I like writing about best. There are only so many ways I can describe juggling or evaluate somersaults.) So I will continue to write about HSU shows here in my online space. I am master here, and I know my interest in plays and performance, writers and actors, etc. far outweigh my supposed financial self-interest based on a review.

I initially posted a much longer discussion of conflict of interest issues, and many more details about myself. But upon reflection, I decided to simply make this statement and move on.

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

CLOWNS WITHOUT BORDERS are giving two benefit performances on Saturday, March 24 at 2 PM and 8 PM at the Arcata Dancenter. Proceeds support local performers going to Mexico and other countries. Rudi Galindo sent along these photos.
Posted by Picasa

Photos from my Ashland trip

outside Ashland early a.m. BK photo
From my first visit in 2006:

Building on Ashland’s early 20th century success with Chautauqua circuit performances, OSF grew in fits and starts since 1935 to become one of the major regional theatres in North America. In three superbly designed theatres (by Richard L. Hay, who still designs shows in them), OSF produces 11 plays—contemporary as well as Shakespeare and other classics--over its 8-and-a-half month season. It sells some 380,000 tickets for 776 performances, employing about a hundred performers, and 450 others. Its yearly mission, in the words of resident actor-teacher David Eric Thompson, is to “tell 11 stories with as much passion and energy and technical bravura as we can.”

 So today the industry of Ashland is theatre, and not just at OSF. On my visit, Wendy Wasserstein’s American Daughter was at the Camelot Theatre Company, Oregon Cabaret Theatre was doing Tick, Tick, Boom! (a musical by Rent author Jonathan Larsen) and Southern Oregon University was mounting Ibsen’s Ghosts, to be followed by A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum.  Ashland Children’s Theatre was preparing its annual Incredible Theatre Camp.

 Shops, restaurants, white-water rafting—there’s plenty more to do, but it all revolves around OSF. The Festival offers theatre tours (many in our group had taken one before), talks, related concerts and other events. A visitor’s center has vintage costumes on display, and a gift store features theatrical masks and Oscar Wilde action figures. OSF proves that in the TV and movie age, people are still fascinated with live theatre.

 Theatre in Ashland fulfills many hopes, and demolishes many excuses. It’s not New York or any large city, or even near one. Yet people travel hundreds of miles to see Shakespeare done with high artistry, clarity and style. Other classics and contemporary plays are likewise performed to fully engaged and responsive audiences of young and old, who typically see two plays a day, with actors as well as audiences as fully committed in matinees as in evening performances. It can be done, and the proof is living.

Good place for breakfast: the Wild Goose Cafe.
Posted by Picasa

Kids lining up at the Bowmer Theatre.
Posted by Picasa

The next day--spring!
Posted by Picasa

heading home
Posted by Picasa

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

On the North Coast

This Weekend..

Dell' Arte first year students present their annual program of Melodrama this weekend, Thursday through Saturday, March 15-17 at the Carlo Theatre in Blue Lake. Six student-written and acted 15 minute plays "explore moral dilemmas, neurosis, obsession and the struggle against repressive forces. "

Here is my preview of last year's show, which discusses the concept and practice of melodrama.

$7 general and $5 for students/seniors. The Thursday performance is "pay what you can. "For mature audiences. Reservations: 707-668-5663 Ext. 20. Visit for more information.

Friday, March 9, 2007

Live Blogging from Ashland

Season Preview

We're in Ashland--actually, a motel on the fringe of Ashland, right next to the Rogue River National Forest--to see some plays at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival. We saw Tom Stoppard's On the Razzle last night--and it's likely to be one of the hits of this, Libby Appel's last season as artistic director. Today it's As You Like It for the matinee, and The Cherry Orchard tonight. Am I dreaming? Not likely, since I got almost no sleep last night. But after the Shasta Breakfast at the Wild Goose Cafe, I'm great. For now. These plays may look like a dream as the day goes on.

All the plays except the one we'll see Saturday before returning will play through the summer, so it may be awhile before I write about them in the Stage Matters column. We're already talking about when we'll return, to catch several of the plays that start later, especially August Wilson's Gem of the Ocean --which will be the first of his plays I've seen anywhere but Pittsburgh, several times with him in attendance. And then the big productions in the outdoor summer theatre, which is an experience I haven't had yet.

Again, even this early in the season, what's great about this other than the high quality of the productions is the audience. Last night was weighted towards high school students in groups on one end, and gray-haired couples at the other, with a decent sized minority of folks in between. But the audiences are alive. Right now, here in the motel lobby/breakfast nook, there are several h.s. students and their teacher, here for plays. I have yet to see the smirks and slouches of the cynical and unwilling, though some of the conversations indicate that at least some of these kids participate in theatre in their schools. I caught a bit of several last night talking excitedly about the stage set, and how the entrances and exits were managed. This is always how it gets passed on. The future of theatre in the seats.

Next trip we hope to see some other theatre here. There's one advertising: Men On Skates: The Wisconsin Ice Fisherman's Musical. Which could be a case of a title too funny for the play to live up to. If it's here when we come back, maybe we'll see.

By the way if you're wondering, the Journal doesn't pay a cent of my expenses, for this or any other trip.

Sunday, March 4, 2007

The TV Stage

Harold Pinter on Charlie Rose
Posted by Picasa

The TV Stage

Pinter and Misha on Charlie Rose

On the Charlie Rose Show site, you can see his interviews broadcast Thursday and Friday with playwright and 2005 Nobel Prize for Literature Laureate Harold Pinter, and legendary dancer Mikhail Baryishnikov. The Pinter interview contains some of Charlie at his worst--taking it upon himself to defend the honor of the U.S. against Pinter's analysis of war and imperialism, and not only badgering him but giving us way more Charlie than we need in what is likely to be one of the last lengthy TV interviews Pinter will do. Still, Pinter didn't lose his composure or seem offended--he even seemed to be enjoying himself-- so maybe their relationship made this an expected encounter. The rest of the program is quite good but I still could have done with more Pinter, more theatre talk and less hectoring from CR.

Pinter provided a few peeks into how he approaches the process of writing and doing theatre. David Mamet says that Pinter and Beckett brought poetry back to the theatre, but Pinter said he valued producing exciting theatre. In responding to questions about his tremendous influence on writing for the stage, he talked about the writers who excited and influenced him. He could see their singular visions, but not his own; writing is doing. "The only thing I can really say about my work," he told Charlie," is that it makes me laugh." His tactic is to get a laugh, and then shut it up.

The interview was done in December, as Pinter finished his run starring in his friend Samuel Beckett's Krapp's Last Tape. There was no video from that performance, but I hope it was recorded. Not only is it likely to be a superior performance with great insight into the play, but Pinter's last stage appearance. At age 76 and weakened by cancer, he said several times that he's written his last play, though he still writes poetry. For all his dour themes and politics, he seemed to have thoroughly enjoyed his writing life, not only his more than two dozen plays but his nearly two dozen screenplays.

As for his politics, he recalls the experience of being bombed and seeing the effects of bombing during the London Blitz more than 65 years ago, when bombs were much less powerful than now. "I understood what bombing is, what bombs do," which, he said, leaders don't comprehend or won't face: the death, mutilation and destruction that results from political gestures.

The Baryishnikov interview was often the opposite of Pinter's--much more Misha than Charlie, and quite easy and good. He seems like a terrific person--very generous in his comments on others, philosophical about his own choices, but honest, and very articulate. He always struck me as a singularly civilized man. He talked about more or less backing into the movies--his first role, in The Turning Point, was supposed to involve just dancing, but bits of dialogue were added on the set, then more, then more, and he became a major character. But what he remembers is watching Shirley McLaine and Ann Bancroft act. Charlie showed a dance from another film, White Nights, with Gregory Hines. Hines was a great dancer, and kept up very well with Misha, but there were differences--Hines used his arms a lot more, which may have been style, but it also seemed that Misha didn't need to--he moved so economically, with no wasted motion, and perfect control.

He also talked about seeing every kind of movement as dance, and remembering how people move, even if he can't remember their faces or names. There were a few moments of him dancing now, at the age of 59. Despite 11 surgeries, he still has that grace and economy and perfect control. An inspiration, to be sure.

Thursday, March 1, 2007

On the North Coast

The Weekend Review

A rave review of Cloud 9 at HSU by Meghan Vogel in the Times-Standard... A feature by Wendy Butler in the Eureka Reporter on the Dell'Arte MFA students project working with the Eureka Adult School’s Traumatic Brain Injury class to create and present a theatre piece called Snap! Laura Provost previews the Ferndale Rep teen production of Hamlet: Through the Looking Glass, also in the Reporter.